Mocking Meghan McCain for grieving her father’s death is as gross as cheering Rand Paul’s attacker

Last week, the Libertarian Party of New Hampshire posted this on the fourth anniversary of Sen. John McCain’s death: https://twitter.com/LPNH/status/1562886932815704065 It was obviously a photo of Meghan McCain grieving her father’s death with the tweet mocking her. A friend texted it to me first. He wrote, “We both know my feelings about what John McCain did to our foreign policy, but this is f***ed up.”  It was totally f***ed up.  Many had the same reaction I did. I don’t mean Democrats and Never Trumpers, that was predictable. I mean libertarians and conservatives who also didn’t like John McCain and what he stood for. Also predictably, many defended the tweet on the grounds that her father’s policies killed and tortured so many that she and her family deserved no quarter for his war crimes. Sen. McCain’s foreign policy views and his general eagerness for war did more damage to the United States than almost anything else imaginable. The Bush-Cheney-era War on Terror, in which McCain and the neoconservatives were central actors, cost countless lives, both Americans and foreign, and took a battering ram to the Constitution more than any other event in my lifetime.  When Barack Obama ran for president in 2008, he smartly ran against the Iraq War. Learning zero lessons—and apparently not even caring about the polls at the time—when McCain ran against Obama he said we should fight that war for another 100 years if necessary. Clearly, McCain was a menace. I have spent the last decade and then some slamming the neoconservatives and John McCain time and time and time and time and time and time and time and time and time (I could literally do this forever) again. I have been personally targeted by the neocons. When Democrats, Never Trump Republicans, and maddeningly, some libertarians, lavished praise all over unrepentant warmonger Liz Cheney for her cockamamie role in the January 6 investigations, I shot that charade down. Here’s how Meghan McCain apparently feels about me:

That said, it is hard to imagine a context in which I would mock a child grieving her dead parent.  Similarly, if I were a Democrat, it’s hard to imagine encouraging physical violence against a Republican I disagreed with. Many Democrats disagree: https://twitter.com/BetteMidler/status/961800320014737408 Bette Midler tweeted this after Sen. Paul held up a $400 billion spending bill. That’s it. Cheering the neighbor who attacked Paul from behind and broke several of his ribs has become something of a hobby for many Democrats. https://twitter.com/lvhothead2483/status/1561806608467800064 https://twitter.com/OGNurseRatchet/status/1562219579450896384 https://twitter.com/davematt88/status/1562252787299368960 https://twitter.com/CharlesXHawtrey/status/1562103178547630081 MSNBC’s Kasie Hunt celebrated Paul’s attack as one of her “favorite” stories of 2017. The former Democratic Secretary of State in Kentucky, Alison Lundergan Grimes, thought the Paul assault was hilarious. If you wanted to go down the rabbit hole, a simple Twitter search of “Rand Paul” and “neighbor” is endless, with each tweet nastier than the next. Most libertarians and conservatives I know find glorifying Paul’s attacker disgusting. But if you are a lefty who literally believes this… https://twitter.com/robreiner/status/1529217766950981632 …then Democrats can rationalize in their minds speaking the way they do about Paul and his assault. They feel morally justified in doing so. If you actually believe Paul not voting for a spending bill would starve children, if you actually believe the senator questioning Anthony Fauci would undermine the doctor’s ability to save millions from dying of COVID-19, if you actually believe this Republican questioning U.S. aid to Ukraine was threatening the lives of Ukrainians, then you can likely imagine a long list of justifications for why you might want to see harm come his way.  All of them are wrong. All of them would likely be in bad taste, at a minimum. You could similarly apply the same treatment to every member of Congress for an endless array of reasons. If you literally believe Donald Trump is or was Hitler, as many lefties have, you can rationalize all sorts of evil. If the president of the United States actually believes Trump’s followers are fascists, where does that line of thinking end? Real life matters. It’s hard to imagine most Democrats actually being in Paul’s yard on the awful day of his assault and cheering the violence on. That would be inhuman. No doubt, some people are inhuman. Still, it’s hard to imagine the New Hampshire Libertarian tweeter or anyone else standing next to Meghan McCain’s father’s casket in that picture and mocking her tears in person. That would be monstrous. No doubt, some folks are monstrous. Some are quick to point out Meghan McCain's own lack of sympathy for others:  https://twitter.com/MisesChair/status/1563255376375472131 https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1116759407843475456 What would Assange’s wife think of McCain’s comments? If Mrs. McCain were in the same room as Assange, and saw up close the reportedly cruel and inhumane treatment he is suffering, would she cheer it? If she had to actually visit Guantanamo Bay, would she applaud the savagery there?  Again, I could add all the bodies her father’s policies were responsible for, but that is part of the point: We could inject a myriad of reasons coming from our own perspectives about why certain human beings having a basic human moment—like grieving a dead parent—should be mocked for doing so for reasons that have nothing to do with that moment.  And it’s almost always foolish to do this. Former Libertarian Party Vice Presidential candidate Spike Cohen had a sober view:  https://twitter.com/RealSpikeCohen/status/1563406592393228288 If the goal is to be edgy, then I guess have at it. If your goal is to be effective, especially for a party that is ostensibly about ideas more than raw partisanship, that tweet is going to gross far more people out than have them come around to your perspective. ‘Rand Paul had his ribs broken? Well, I’ll tell that to all the school shooting victims.’ ‘Happy Holidays.’ Jesus. In the grand scheme of things, respecting basic human emotions and dignity matters. Form matters. Judgment matters. Context. Grace. Empathy. Sympathy. These things are going to always matter to most people. Even in complex situations. Even in morally questionable situations. Even if they don’t matter to you.

Like this article? Check out the latest BASEDPolitics podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or below:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dli68eLELKg&t=1s