RFK Jr’s latest policy proposal is absolutely insane

It would devastate the economy.

Many commentators and influencers on the Right have found themselves enchanted with Democratic presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., due to his skepticism of things like COVID-19 lockdowns. But the long-time environmental activist just reminded us of his progressive bona fides—by staking out a painfully misguided policy position. 

RFK called for a ban on fracking, a drilling technique used to extract natural resources from the ground, as part of his plan to end what he sees as a crisis in plastic pollution. 

This isn’t a novel position. Progressives like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren have long called to ban fracking in the name of environmentalism. Yet it’s a terrible, self-defeating idea that would have dire economic (and environmental) consequences. 

Likely cause a dire recession and hurt consumers

Banning fracking would hurt consumers and likely cause a massive recession.

    According to the Manhattan Institute, banning fracking would lead to a 7% decrease in the global oil supply and a 17% decrease in the global gas supply. This would lead to a 200% increase in gas prices, costing the average American family $1,000 more annually at the gas pump.  

    So, too, it would most likely cause a massive global recession. This isn’t pure speculation, because we have clear historical precedent. As the Manhattan Institute notes, in 1973, Saudi Arabia enacted an oil embargo that took roughly 7% of the global oil supply off the market. The result: “world oil prices jumped 400% and triggered a global recession.” Something similar happened in 1979 when Iran took 5% off the market. 

    Likely increase CO2 emissions

    The push to ban fracking comes from the types of environmental activists who are very concerned about climate change. But, ironically, banning fracking would most likely lead to an increase in carbon emissions, at least in the short term. 

    Why? Well, because to continue to meet our energy needs without fracking, we would need to fire up coal power plants, which have significantly higher emissions than the natural gas power plants that rely on fracking. 

    A 2021 report from the Department of Energy found that, “In the first year of a ban, the country would see a year-over-year increase in carbon dioxide (CO2)…. emissions with these emissions rising 16 percent. This outcome undermines the considerable progress the United States power generation sector has made in cutting emissions by 30 percent… for CO2… during the 2005 to 2019 time period.”


    The takeaway

    The economic and environmental benefits of fracking, although like anything it certainly has its costs/downsides, are so strong that even the progressive media outlet Vox reported: “Natural gas obtained by fracking has reduced emissions, aided the economy, and helped clean energy rise, while costing less than dirtier fuels.”

    So, banning fracking would devastate the economy, hit consumers with a gut punch, and probably increase C02 emissions. Other than that, it’s really a great idea, RFK Jr.

    Like this article? Check out the latest BASEDPolitics podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or below:

    YouTube player

    Sign up for Our Email List

    * indicates required
    *By signing up for our email you consent to getting our emails directly in your inbox. These including our newsletter or other informational emails*

    Our Latest Podcast

    Related articles

    Rand Paul: Why did the Left abandon its defense of free speech?

    Rand Paul asked a great question. https://twitter.com/RandPaul/status/1730256213059776625 The answer is simple:...

    Dr. Fauci set for dramatic showdown in Congress

    Go ahead and pencil January 8th and 9th into...

    Javier Milei proved that libertarian populism can win

    In 2008 and 2012, Republican Congressman Ron Paul ran...

    Don’t fall for ‘woke’ misinformation about the origins of Thanksgiving

    Who doesn’t love Thanksgiving ? Woke social media activists, apparently. Every time this...
    Brad Polumbo
    Brad Polumbo
    Brad Polumbo is a libertarian-conservative journalist and co-founder of Based Politics. His work has been cited by top lawmakers such as Senator Rand Paul, Senator Ted Cruz, Senator Pat Toomey, Congresswoman Nancy Mace, Congressman Thomas Massie, and former UN Ambassador Nikki Haley, as well as by prominent media personalities such as Jordan Peterson, Sean Hannity, Dave Rubin, Ben Shapiro, and Mark Levin. Brad has also testified before the US Senate, appeared on Fox News and Fox Business, and written for publications such as USA Today, National Review, Newsweek, and the Daily Beast. He hosts the Breaking Boundaries podcast and has a bachelor’s degree in economics from the University of Massachusetts Amherst.