Here’s why a father of a Parkland shooting victim SUPPORTS Florida’s ‘constitutional carry’ push

Ryan Petty made his case for expanding, not restricting, gun rights.

Ron DeSantis and state Republicans are poised to pass a big expansion of gun rights in Florida—and some people are pissed. But critics are completely off-base.

The legislation in question is what’s known as “constitutional carry.” Right now, you can concealed carry a firearm in Florida, but you have to pay a hefty fee and jump through hoops before you can do so. This bill would make it so you no longer need to do any of that to conceal carry. “The Constitution is my gun permit” and all that. However, importantly, it would still be illegal for certain groups of ineligible people, like violent felons, to carry guns.

“I believe Floridians have the right to bear arms to protect themselves, their families and their property without government interference,” state Rep. Chuck Brannan, who is authoring the legislation, said. “This bill is a big step to help the average law-abiding citizen to keep from having to go through the hoops of getting a permit from the government to carry their weapons.”

“[Criminals are] breaking into houses, they’re breaking into cars, and they’re carrying guns illegally,” he added. “They don’t care what the law says. We are only giving our law-abiding citizens a simpler way to have the ability to protect themselves, their families, their homes and their places of business.”

Of course, like with any expansion of gun rights, it’s prompting panic and dire warnings from the anti-gun crowd. 

Anti-gun activist David Hogg, a survivor of the tragic Parkland school shooting, even invoked the tragedy at his school as an argument against the move:

Meanwhile, Ryan Petty, whose daughter died in the shooting, took the opposite stance:

Before you go believing the hype and thinking that this is going to turn Florida into the Wild West, remember that 24 other states already have this kind of system. Many of them, like Alaska, New Hampshire, Maine, and Vermont, have murder and gun homicide rates significantly below the national average. 

And, while critics foam at the mouth about how dangerous this is, a RAND Corporation literature review of the top studies available found some studies showing a decrease in crime, some showing an increase, and others showing no effect. It concluded that the evidence is “inconclusive,” and thus does not support the notion that constitutional carry makes states more dangerous. 

A permitting process can serve to block poor people from being able to defend themselves. People who work minimum wage jobs can’t afford to take a whole Saturday off, attend and pay for an expensive training class, wait additional hours at a county office, and pay the government just for the right to protect themselves. And that means these laws merely work exactly as they were initially intended to—to block poor white people and people of color from gun ownership and self-defense.

Even the Florida Sherriff’s Association—not a group you’d think of as “soft on crime”—has thrown its support behind the move. 

“Criminals don’t go get a permit, not one of them,” Brevard County Sheriff Wayne Ivey said. “They don’t care about obeying the law. Our law-abiding citizens have that immediate [legal] guarantee and the freedom to go protect themselves. We as Florida sheriffs stand solidly behind this. And we stand behind the oath that we took to protect the United States Constitution and the Constitution of Florida.”

So why shouldn’t people be able to exercise their constitutional rights without a permission slip from the government? This move seems like common sense to me. 

Like this article? Check out the latest BASEDPolitics podcast on Apple PodcastsSpotify, or below:

YouTube player

Sign up for Our Email List

* indicates required
*By signing up for our email you consent to getting our emails directly in your inbox. These including our newsletter or other informational emails*

Our Latest Podcast

Related articles

How you know US aid to Ukraine might be coming to an end

Lindsey Graham said on CNN’s State of the Union...

Rand Paul: Why did the Left abandon its defense of free speech?

Rand Paul asked a great question. The answer is simple:...

Dr. Fauci set for dramatic showdown in Congress

Go ahead and pencil January 8th and 9th into...

Javier Milei proved that libertarian populism can win

In 2008 and 2012, Republican Congressman Ron Paul ran...
Brad Polumbo
Brad Polumbo
Brad Polumbo is a libertarian-conservative journalist and co-founder of Based Politics. His work has been cited by top lawmakers such as Senator Rand Paul, Senator Ted Cruz, Senator Pat Toomey, Congresswoman Nancy Mace, Congressman Thomas Massie, and former UN Ambassador Nikki Haley, as well as by prominent media personalities such as Jordan Peterson, Sean Hannity, Dave Rubin, Ben Shapiro, and Mark Levin. Brad has also testified before the US Senate, appeared on Fox News and Fox Business, and written for publications such as USA Today, National Review, Newsweek, and the Daily Beast. He hosts the Breaking Boundaries podcast and has a bachelor’s degree in economics from the University of Massachusetts Amherst.