Why ‘liberals’ don’t care about the Twitter Files

Their mission appears to be to nuke the reports and defame the reporters. Here's why.

Many ‘liberals’ simply don’t care about some of the most basic aspects of liberalism anymore. News coverage of the Twitter Files has been a stark reminder.

The latest installment of the Twitter Files came out over the Christmas holiday alleging that the CIA, FBI and White House had been involved in content moderation on the site, and also that the platform had “rigged” the COVID-19 debate. The ninth report published by Matt Taibbi on Christmas Eve and the latest by David Zweig on Monday have been reported by mainstream outlets, but only barely.

All of the Twitter Files to date, reported by Taibbi along with independent journalists Zweig, Bari Weiss, Michael Shellenberg appear to show massive and widespread cooperation between the federal government and Twitter in regulating basic speech. One might expect such revelations to spark great controversy and generate top headlines.

One would be wrong: With the exception of Fox News, among national major news outlets, most have primarily published reports or opinion that seek to undermine the seriousness of these reports.

The ‘liberal’ mission appears to be to nuke the Twitter Files and defame its reporters.

Let’s pick on CNN alone and their headlines. Oliver Darcy says, “Elon Musk claims the FBI paid Twitter to ‘censor info from the public.’ Here’s what the Twitter Files actually show.” Of course, Darcy thinks they show nothing.

Claire Duffy says, “The real revelation from the ‘Twitter Files’: Content moderation is messy.” See, it’s just messy.

Meanwhile, Dean Obeidallah thinks we should not demand answers from the CIA, FBI or Biden administration, but instead “Congress needs to subpoena Musk and the entire ‘Twitter Files.” That’s right, go after Musk and his free speech shenanigans.

Darcy even returned to inform readers “Why news organizations are largely skeptical of Elon Musk’s ‘Twitter Files’ theater.”

You would be hard pressed to find a CNN piece with any sense of alarm over what the Twitter Files appear to show. You will be similarly hard pressed to find many stories about the Twitter Files in most mainstream media. As a recent Fox News headline read, “Twitter files: CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS blackout coverage of Elon Musk leaks.”

The lack of coverage of the Twitter Files suggests that major shifts have now happened in American political life that beg two questions: What is the role of the press today? And what does that mean for the future of free speech?

On Christmas Eve, George Washington University’s Jonathan Turley offered an answer by way of comparison. He brought up a major 1970s political controversy, in which the entire country and media were up in arms over the federal government overstepping its bounds.

“After Watergate, there was bipartisan support for reforming the FBI and intelligence agencies,” Turley noted. “Today, that cacophony of voices has been replaced by crickets, as much of the media imposes another effective blackout on coverage of the Twitter Files.”

Turley also observed, “This media silence suggests that the FBI found the ‘sweet spot’ on censorship, supporting the views of the political and media establishment.”

In every CNN example linked above, in almost every mainstream article that even dares to cover the Twitter Files, there is an implicit—and sometimes explicit—understanding that whatever the communications of the old Twitter regime supposedly show, the federal government was only doing its job and pre-Musk Twitter was being responsible in aiding this ‘content moderation.’

What you would be hard pressed to find is questions about the federal government possibly violating the First Amendment.

That’s what good ‘liberals’ do, they help the government. Independent journalist Leighton Woodhouse notes, “It’s not just that the corporate media has abandoned the kind of adversarial journalism exemplified by the reporting on the Twitter Files; it has taken on the role of defending the state against those who continue to practice it.”

Turley seems right: The FBI has figured out that it can direct and squash speech so long as those actions are combined with reinforcing Democrat-favored narratives. These supposed adults are being responsible and protecting everyone from any childish “misinformation” spread by right-wing goons.

This is the level of outright censorship all involved seem content to live with. And they see nothing wrong with this. It’s normal ‘liberal’ behavior.

Just ask former Twitter employee Marc Burrows:

During the Watergate scandal, the entire country was rocked by the Nixon administration’s attempts to cover-up a break in at the Democratic National Committee. It caused a president to resign in disgrace.

The Twitter Files appear to show the FBI, CIA, DHS, the Biden administration, and even the Trump administration frequently and aggressively lobbying a major social media platform all the time for a long time to censor speech. Crickets.

Imagine an alternative scenario where George Soros buys Twitter and reveals that the old owners dutifully worked with the Trump administration to suppress speech about COVID-19, the January 6 Capitol Riot, abortion, and anything that might challenge popular Republican narratives.

What would CNN, or Brian Stelter, or Don Lemon, or Oliver Darcy, or The View, or Jimmy Kimmel, or the Washington Post say about such a violation of the First Amendment?

EVERYTHING. All the time. It would dominate the media.

Right now, the average American ‘liberal’ likely either has never heard about the Twitter Files, or if they have, considers it right-wing propaganda—which is exactly how the mainstream media has presented it. By design.

At least one liberal writer has acknowledged its legitimacy and danger. I was encouraged to find an important piece by Ross Barkan at The Nation urging his fellow progressives to consider the threat to our basic civil liberties the Twitter Files have revealed.

“It became quite easy, in the days after the so-called Twitter Files were dumped across the Internet, to dismiss entirely all of their revelations,” Barkan wrote. “For many progressives, the whole affair was a right-coded distraction, and therefore worth deriding or ignoring altogether.”

“The Twitter Files, however, do matter…” he insisted. “There’s an absolute danger in allowing a select few human beings to decide, rapidly and arbitrarily, what is ‘good’ speech or ‘bad’… The possibilities for abuse are endless.

“The Twitter Files, at the minimum, should push us closer to reckoning with the gravity of these unsettling questions,” Barkan warned.

That required minimum care is not shared by the overwhelming majority of Barkan’s fellow progressives who man the media, and thus this news is not transmitted to Americans who only consume the mainstream press and loathe Fox News. When this news is shared by mainstream outlets, its source and reporters are maligned.

Despite the Left’s endless warnings about various ‘threats to democracy’ coming from the Right, the jarring logical conclusion that Twitter worked hand-in-hand with the U.S. government to censor free speech is just not something most American liberals are going to care about at this point.

Despite overwhelming evidence. Despite liberalism.

Like this article? Check out the latest BASEDPolitics podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or below:

Sign up for Our Email List

* indicates required
*By signing up for our email you consent to getting our emails directly in your inbox. These including our newsletter or other informational emails*

Our Latest Podcast

Related articles

Jack Hunter
Jack Hunterhttp://LibertyTree.com
Jack Hunter is a freelance writer, the co-author of Sen. Rand Paul’s 2011 book ‘The Tea Party Goes to Washington’ and the editor of the libertarian news site Liberty Tree, published by Sen. Paul’s campaign.

1 COMMENT

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here