Top progressive activist says student debt cancelation isn’t up for debate

That one of the most prominent progressive advocates for student debt cancelation is unwilling to debate anyone on the subject suggests that she knows how empty and hypocritical her talking points truly are.

Progressive activist Nina Turner is one of the loudest online advocates for student debt “cancelation,” aka having taxpayers absorb the loss for $1.6 trillion in federal student loans. But apparently, Turner also thinks that this issue is beyond debate and that anyone who disagrees with her opposes human rights, or something.

It all started Saturday with this tweet:

Turner said she hasn’t ever heard an argument against her position other than pure cruelty. So, I offered to debate her on it. She declined.

That’s fine! Turner has no obligation to debate me. Maybe she thinks I’m not worth her time. She does have far more followers than I do, to be fair.

But as it turns out, she’s actually unwilling to debate anyone on this subject.

That’s simply unhinged.

Student debt cancelation means spending trillions of the American people’s tax money to pay off the bills of a relatively affluent slice of society. One study even found it would benefit the top 20% six times more than the bottom 20%. It’s a regressive taxpayer bailout.

So, it’s little wonder that this proposal is unpopular with voters. Full student debt cancelation—Turner’s position—is supported by just 37% of the public, NPR polling finds.

That’s right: More than 6 in 10 Americans disagree with Turner’s proposal. But she nonetheless thinks it’s beyond debate, because it’s a question of “human rights” and “people shouldn’t profit from knowledge.”

It’s particularly funny to see Turner claim that there’s no place for profit in education. She is a professor, according to her Twitter bio. I wonder: Does she take a salary or any form of compensation? Or does she just teach as a form of charity?

Anyway, Nina Turner certainly doesn’t have to debate me on this issue. But that one of the most prominent progressive advocates for student debt cancelation is unwilling to debate anyone on the subject suggests that she knows how empty and hypocritical her talking points truly are.

Like this article? Check out the latest BASEDPolitics podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or below:

 

Sign up for Our Email List

* indicates required
*By signing up for our email you consent to getting our emails directly in your inbox. These including our newsletter or other informational emails*

Our Latest Podcast

Related articles

Federal ‘anti-terrorism’ funds flowed to zoos, museums: watchdog report

The Department of Homeland Security spent $520 million over...

Kanye West and Candace Owens boast ‘White Lives Matter’ sweatshirts

Another day, another stupid controversy blowing up the internet....

Outrage mounts after more taxpayer dollars go to COVID scientist

You’re probably unfamiliar with the name Peter Daszak, but...

Oops: Biden’s student loan bailout still mostly helps high-earners, nonpartisan analysis confirms

Progressive proposals for total student debt “cancelation” (aka transfer...

‘Black’ activist Shaun King gets exposed as the grifter he always was

Within the black community, opinions on so-called "civil rights”...
Brad Polumbo
Brad Polumbo
Brad Polumbo is a libertarian-conservative journalist and co-founder of Based Politics. His work has been cited by top lawmakers such as Senator Rand Paul, Senator Ted Cruz, Senator Pat Toomey, Congresswoman Nancy Mace, Congressman Thomas Massie, and former UN Ambassador Nikki Haley, as well as by prominent media personalities such as Jordan Peterson, Sean Hannity, Dave Rubin, Ben Shapiro, and Mark Levin. Brad has also testified before the US Senate, appeared on Fox News and Fox Business, and written for publications such as USA Today, National Review, Newsweek, and the Daily Beast. He hosts the Breaking Boundaries podcast and has a bachelor’s degree in economics from the University of Massachusetts Amherst.

3 COMMENTS

  1. “I still haven’t heard a reason against student debt cancelation that isn’t rooted in cruelty.”

    Contract law is cruelty?

    Bizarre interpretation.

    “Here’s the problem debating student debt cancelation—it’s not a debate.

    I believe education is a human right and that college should be tuition-free. Debt cancelation is a part of that.”

    That’s the problem: it’s hard to debate religious beliefs.

  2. Hilarious that she thinks her name will drive views.

    Want to pay off student debt, let’s first use the massive endowments held by our universities.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here