AOC’s abortion temper tantrum would destroy the rule of law

Regardless of party or ideology, this is not something anyone should support.

The debate over abortion is fundamentally a debate about human life itself. So, it’s no surprise that people on either side of the issue often have strong emotions underlying their positions. But that’s no excuse for letting passion override their better judgment, which is exactly what Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and several other members of Congress are doing in the aftermath of a federal judge’s controversial ruling on abortion medication.

On Friday, U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk issued a ruling that suspended the Food and Drug Administration’s approval for the commonly used abortion medication mifepristone. He ruled that the FDA exceeded its legal authority, and he second-guessed its conclusions about the drug’s safety. This decision has triggered tremendous backlash from Democratic officials and liberal media outlets alike (and, it’s worth noting, some substantive criticism even from right-leaning legal scholars).

That was predictable. But what did come as a surprise is just how far some Democrats took their backlash.

“President Biden can and must ignore this ruling and keep mifepristone on the market and accessible for every woman in America,” Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) said in response to the ruling.

“I believe that the Biden administration should ignore this ruling,” Ocasio-Cortez similarly said on CNN. “The interesting thing when it comes to a ruling is that it relies on enforcement. It is up to the Biden administration to choose whether or not to enforce such a ruling.”

Surprisingly, even one Republican, Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC), seemed to agree with this position when asked about it on CNN.

That’s a shame, because the path outlined by Ocasio-Cortez and company here is deeply short-sighted and irresponsible.

The proper response to a court decision you disagree with is to appeal it. In fact, the judge actually gave the FDA a week before his ruling took effect so it could file for an appeal (and likely get his ruling put on pause) if it so wished. If the decision is really as lawless and unscientific as Democrats are claiming, they should easily win out in appeals court or, if that fails, at the Supreme Court. But for the Biden administration to break with precedent and openly defy the courts would cause nothing short of a constitutional crisis.

You see, Ocasio-Cortez is actually not wrong when she says the judicial branch lacks an enforcement mechanism. The Supreme Court has no army or police force it can send to force a governor or president to abide by its rulings.

That’s right: The judicial branch’s ability to serve as a check on the other branches of government is actually fundamentally fragile because it relies on those branches’ respect for the rule of law and deference to its rulings. If Biden were to “ignore” this one abortion ruling, it would set the stage for any president to ignore any ruling they disliked and push on with their agenda anyway.

Regardless of party or ideology, that’s not something anyone should support.

Democrats, for their part, need only look back to the Trump administration to remember how well the judicial branch served them in their efforts to thwart former President Donald Trump’s agenda. The Supreme Court, despite its conservative majority, blocked Trump’s policies restricting Muslim immigration, rescinding protections for illegal immigrants known as “Dreamers,” and much more when those policies were unconstitutional or otherwise unlawful.

All in all, Trump only won about 47% of the time at the Supreme Court, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile, at the lower federal courts, the Trump administration won only 11% of the time when forced to defend its regulatory policies from legal challenges.

Clearly, Democrats of all people should see why the courts are a valuable branch of government worth conserving, not obliterating. Would they have been fine with Trump simply “ignoring” those court decisions?

Meanwhile, Republicans such as Mace should note that the Supreme Court has blocked Biden’s illegal actions, such as his vaccine mandate and his nationwide “eviction moratorium.” It will also most likely strike down his unilateral attempt to “cancel” (have taxpayers absorb) billions in student loan debt as the unconstitutional act that it is. But if the Biden administration can ignore court rulings in one case where you agree with it — Mace is generally pro-life but apparently does support the FDA authorization of mifepristone — it can ignore the rest, too.

To throw a tantrum and obliterate our judicial system over one decision you dislike would be an unmitigated disaster. Thankfully, so far, the Biden administration is rejecting these irresponsible calls and abiding by the rule of law.

This column originally appeared in the Washington Examiner.

Like this article? Check out the latest BASEDPolitics podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or below:

Sign up for Our Email List

* indicates required
*By signing up for our email you consent to getting our emails directly in your inbox. These including our newsletter or other informational emails*

Our Latest Podcast

Related articles

Thomas Massie is right: Anti-Zionism is not anti-Semitism

Only one Republican voted against the House resolution that...

How you know US aid to Ukraine might be coming to an end

Lindsey Graham said on CNN’s State of the Union...

Rand Paul: Why did the Left abandon its defense of free speech?

Rand Paul asked a great question. The answer is simple:...

Dr. Fauci set for dramatic showdown in Congress

Go ahead and pencil January 8th and 9th into...
Brad Polumbo
Brad Polumbo
Brad Polumbo is a libertarian-conservative journalist and co-founder of Based Politics. His work has been cited by top lawmakers such as Senator Rand Paul, Senator Ted Cruz, Senator Pat Toomey, Congresswoman Nancy Mace, Congressman Thomas Massie, and former UN Ambassador Nikki Haley, as well as by prominent media personalities such as Jordan Peterson, Sean Hannity, Dave Rubin, Ben Shapiro, and Mark Levin. Brad has also testified before the US Senate, appeared on Fox News and Fox Business, and written for publications such as USA Today, National Review, Newsweek, and the Daily Beast. He hosts the Breaking Boundaries podcast and has a bachelor’s degree in economics from the University of Massachusetts Amherst.