Twitter bans prominent foreign policy critic Scott Horton

Hey Elon, what happened to that whole free speech thing?

Scott Horton has built a bit of a cult following over the years through his radio program, Antiwar Radio and complementary news portal, Antiwar.com. Horton holds to a consistent, non-interventionist worldview and his advocacy against US foreign policy in particular has influenced the thinking of countless individuals.

So what could a peaceful, antiwar activist have done to get banned from Twitter—by “new” Twitter under Elon Musk no less? That’s the question the liberty movement is currently demanding answers to.

While Twitter certainly has a much friendlier attitude towards free speech and open discourse under Elon Musk’s ownership than it did before (when it was taking censorship recommendations from the FBI), the platform is still far from perfect. Elon himself has come under fire for his less-than-consistent approach to free speech, and of course, there are still algorithm errors and missteps when it comes to content moderation.

As of right now, we can’t say for sure what Horton did to trigger this action by Twitter. In speaking with Scott himself, he said the company has not explained their decision to him but that it does seem to be a permanent action. 

He also suggested an off-color remark he made about Jordan Peterson, in which he said the author should “jump off a bridge,” could have been the tweet at play. As Horton put it, he made the remark in response to Peterson’s “shilling for the Mujahideen e-Khalq Communist-terrorist cult” in Iran.

This is the exact kind of thing we were led to believe would no longer happen on Twitter, which was a welcomed breath of fresh air for many. Should someone be kicked off a platform for criticizing war crimes and those who support them—even in a crude way—when the very war criminals exist in these spaces with virtually no rebuke? Most would say no.

While a case could be made for a content moderation strategy that blocks comments on suicide, that could simply be carried out by deleting the offending tweets. There’s no need to ban one of the greatest voices for peace over an off-handed remark.

We hope this is merely an oversight on Twitter’s part and one that will be swiftly rectified. In a world full of warmongers, we need voices like Scott’s to push back.

Like this article? Check out the latest BASEDPolitics podcast on Apple PodcastsSpotify, or below:

YouTube player

Sign up for Our Email List

* indicates required
*By signing up for our email you consent to getting our emails directly in your inbox. These including our newsletter or other informational emails*

Our Latest Podcast

Related articles

Geraldo Rivera embarrasses himself in Fox News gun-control debate (again)

Geraldo Rivera must have a humiliation kink. It’s hard...

Republicans introduce bill to audit THIS rogue government agency

Just a few years ago, many Americans likely had...

Signs indicate key Big Tech battle is heading to the Supreme Court

The US Supreme Court just asked the Solicitor General...

Antifa members are domestic terrorists. So are you, probably

Many antifa members are unquestionably terrorists. Six alleged members...
Hannah Cox
Hannah Coxhttp://based-politics.com
Hannah Cox is a libertarian-conservative writer and co-founder of BASEDPolitics. She's also the host of the BASEDPolitics podcast and an experienced political activist.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here