Wow: The Washington Post admits most ‘diversity training’ is unscientific nonsense

Companies rushed to invest in such programs with little research to back them up.

Progressive groupthink has thoroughly infected the establishment media. But once in a while, something insightful does still sneak through the gatekeepers and shine light on the dogma of the day. The latest such revelation comes courtesy of the Washington Post, which surprisingly just published an expert analysis explaining that the “diversity training” movement is bunk.

For context, after the tragic police killing of George Floyd in 2020, corporations fully embraced diversity training, turning it into a multi-billion-dollar industry. Princeton psychology professor Betsy Levy Paluck writes in a new Post op-ed, Chief diversity officer hires tripled among the largest publicly traded companies, enhancing diversity, equity and inclusion offerings for which U.S. companies paid an estimated $3.4 billion to outside firms that year.”

But, while this may have made for good PR, companies were rushing to invest in diversity training with little research backing it up.

“Among people who believe in the basic mission, common questions about diversity training have shifted from ‘Which training is best?’ to ‘Is the training even a good idea?’ and ‘Does the training have negative effects?’” the author, who is very sympathetic to the idea behind the training, explains.

She goes on to explain that there are very few quality studies examining the impact of this kind of training, and cites some evidence of instances where it may even be counterproductive.

For example, “implicit bias” training, which focuses on our alleged unconscious biases, is based on a popular Harvard test. There’s just one problem: the test is complete junk science because many people get different results every single time they take it. Yet, its nonetheless commonly used in Corporate America, higher education, and elsewhere. But research has since shown that this “implicit bias training is worse than useless. It, in the words of that conservative rag Vice, can even “antagonize the workers it’s supposed to help.”

With such conflicting and sparse evidence, Paluck concludes that “We’re treating a pandemic of discrimination and racial and religious resentment with untested drugs.”

Suffice it to say that corporations and government agencies shouldn’t be spending billions on training that’s so divisive and unsubstantiated even liberal media outlets are admitting it.

Like this article? Check out the latest BASEDPolitics podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or below:

Sign up for Our Email List

* indicates required
*By signing up for our email you consent to getting our emails directly in your inbox. These including our newsletter or other informational emails*

Our Latest Podcast

Related articles

Geraldo Rivera embarrasses himself in Fox News gun-control debate (again)

Geraldo Rivera must have a humiliation kink. It’s hard...

Republicans introduce bill to audit THIS rogue government agency

Just a few years ago, many Americans likely had...

Signs indicate key Big Tech battle is heading to the Supreme Court

The US Supreme Court just asked the Solicitor General...

Antifa members are domestic terrorists. So are you, probably

Many antifa members are unquestionably terrorists. Six alleged members...
Brad Polumbo
Brad Polumbo
Brad Polumbo is a libertarian-conservative journalist and co-founder of Based Politics. His work has been cited by top lawmakers such as Senator Rand Paul, Senator Ted Cruz, Senator Pat Toomey, Congresswoman Nancy Mace, Congressman Thomas Massie, and former UN Ambassador Nikki Haley, as well as by prominent media personalities such as Jordan Peterson, Sean Hannity, Dave Rubin, Ben Shapiro, and Mark Levin. Brad has also testified before the US Senate, appeared on Fox News and Fox Business, and written for publications such as USA Today, National Review, Newsweek, and the Daily Beast. He hosts the Breaking Boundaries podcast and has a bachelor’s degree in economics from the University of Massachusetts Amherst.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here