Joe Rogan just perfectly explained the problem with regulating Big Tech

Too many are falling for false solutions that would give the government more control over the internet.

Mega-podcaster Joe Rogan has more influence in today’s politics than any broader on any cable news network. So, it was good to see him use his platform on Friday to push a wise warning about the perils of using the government to “regulate” Big Tech.

Right-of-center Americans are understandably frustrated with the various social media platforms, given their ham-handed censorship and obvious political biases. But too many are falling for false solutions—hawked by so-called populist Republicans—that would give the government more control over the internet.

This is a terrible idea, for the reasons Rogan laid out on Friday.

“You trust the government to regulate the internet?” the host asked after his guest, Rolling Stone co-founder Jann Wenner, who said he “absolutely” trusted the government to regulate what we say online. “You trust the people who got us into the Iraq War under false pretenses to regulate the internet?”

This first point is spot-on. Trusting the government to regulate so-called “misinformation” online naively presumes that politicians and bureaucrats have some divine insight into what’s true and what’s false. In reality, the government itself often pushes dis or misinformation, about everything from nutrition to health policy to the economy.

Furthermore, this naive approach also assumes that government actors will actor benevolently, in the public interest. But we shouldn’t make that assumption, Rogan explains.

“They’re going to regulate the internet in a way that suits their best interests,” he said. “The same way they do with the environment, with energy, with everything.”

Rogan pointed out that there’s “so much money involved.”

This is all right on the money. Americans often assume that businessmen are “greedy,” aka self-interested, and just want profit. They’re right! But then they make the false assumption that the government operates differently, in pursuit of the public interest rather than self interest. In reality, however, public choice economics teaches us that government actors, too, are guided by self-interest.

As a result, giving the government control over the internet won’t result in a benevolent, guiding hand steering social media back toward free speech. It will result in the imposition of the ideological preferences of federal bureaucrats onto online discourse, with categories like “hate speech” and “misinformation” conveniently wielded to shut down mostly right-of-center, government-critical arguments and information. So, too, it will mean decisions made not in the public interest, but in the interest of the most powerful lobbyists and biggest donors.

To be clear, the current state of affairs in Big Tech is far from ideal. But Joe Rogan is right: entrusting the government to step in and “fix” the internet is a recipe for disaster.

Like this article? Check out the latest BASEDPolitics podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or below:

Sign up for Our Email List

* indicates required
*By signing up for our email you consent to getting our emails directly in your inbox. These including our newsletter or other informational emails*

Our Latest Podcast

Related articles

Rand Paul: Why did the Left abandon its defense of free speech?

Rand Paul asked a great question. The answer is simple:...

Dr. Fauci set for dramatic showdown in Congress

Go ahead and pencil January 8th and 9th into...

Javier Milei proved that libertarian populism can win

In 2008 and 2012, Republican Congressman Ron Paul ran...

Don’t fall for ‘woke’ misinformation about the origins of Thanksgiving

Who doesn’t love Thanksgiving ? Woke social media activists, apparently. Every time this...
Brad Polumbo
Brad Polumbo
Brad Polumbo is a libertarian-conservative journalist and co-founder of Based Politics. His work has been cited by top lawmakers such as Senator Rand Paul, Senator Ted Cruz, Senator Pat Toomey, Congresswoman Nancy Mace, Congressman Thomas Massie, and former UN Ambassador Nikki Haley, as well as by prominent media personalities such as Jordan Peterson, Sean Hannity, Dave Rubin, Ben Shapiro, and Mark Levin. Brad has also testified before the US Senate, appeared on Fox News and Fox Business, and written for publications such as USA Today, National Review, Newsweek, and the Daily Beast. He hosts the Breaking Boundaries podcast and has a bachelor’s degree in economics from the University of Massachusetts Amherst.