Oops: Biden’s student loan bailout still mostly helps high-earners, nonpartisan analysis confirms

"The Administration’s student debt cancellation proposal is costly, inflationary, will drive up higher education costs, and will deliver the majority of the benefits to those in the top half of the income spectrum,” the experts conclude.

Progressive proposals for total student debt “cancelation” (aka transfer to taxpayers) have long been plagued by a salient criticism: they mostly help the affluent. One study even found that full student debt cancelation would help the top 20% of earners 6x more than the bottom 20%. President Biden wanted to ensure that his executive action “canceling” $10,000-$20,000 in debt per borrower wouldn’t fall into this same hypocritical pattern, so he added some income constraints. 

It didn’t work. Biden’s costly and arguably illegal student loan bailout will still mostly end up benefitting higher earners, a new analysis from the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget confirms. 

Their experts ran the numbers on Biden’s final proposal, including the income caps, and concluded that it will still offer 57% to 65% of its benefits to the top half of income earners. (And they say that even this might be an underestimate).

That’s right: a majority of the benefits will flow to the top half, not the struggling poor and working class. Why?

Well, for one thing, any form of student debt relief only benefits those who attended college. And that’s a relatively more affluent slice of society—that’s why people go to college, after all.

So, too, the fact that the plan is “opt-in” will create a hurdle prompting some low-income people not to participate. And the fact that the Biden administration is using 2020 income data to determine qualification is going to highly skew the results, as many people briefly earned little/less during the height of the pandemic but have now fully recovered.

“In the end, the Administration’s student debt cancellation proposal is costly, inflationary, will drive up higher education costs, and will deliver the majority of the benefits to those in the top half of the income spectrum,” the Committee concludes. 

Nice job, Joe. 

WATCH: Sam Seder debates libertarian (me) on ‘canceling’ student debt | Majority Report

YouTube player

Sign up for Our Email List

* indicates required
*By signing up for our email you consent to getting our emails directly in your inbox. These including our newsletter or other informational emails*

Our Latest Podcast

Related articles

Why it’s important that Matt Taibbi reported the Twitter Files

New Twitter owner Elon Musk has been teasing a...

Kanye West reminds us why edgelordism is a dead end

Kanye West is down with Hitler. Or so “Ye” said...

Is Apple working with China to suppress freedom protestors?

Apple CEO Tim Cook appeared on Capitol Hill this...

Kanye West is an anti-Semitic wokester

When Ye, the artist formerly known as Kanye West,...
Brad Polumbo
Brad Polumbo
Brad Polumbo is a libertarian-conservative journalist and co-founder of Based Politics. His work has been cited by top lawmakers such as Senator Rand Paul, Senator Ted Cruz, Senator Pat Toomey, Congresswoman Nancy Mace, Congressman Thomas Massie, and former UN Ambassador Nikki Haley, as well as by prominent media personalities such as Jordan Peterson, Sean Hannity, Dave Rubin, Ben Shapiro, and Mark Levin. Brad has also testified before the US Senate, appeared on Fox News and Fox Business, and written for publications such as USA Today, National Review, Newsweek, and the Daily Beast. He hosts the Breaking Boundaries podcast and has a bachelor’s degree in economics from the University of Massachusetts Amherst.

1 COMMENT

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here