New Zealand’s Prime Minister declares free speech a ‘weapon of war’

“How do you ensure the human rights of others are upheld, when they are subjected to hateful and dangerous rhetoric and ideology?” she pondered.

On Saturday, New Zealand’s Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern addressed the United Nations General Assembly. Plenty of news outlets covered it. 

However, I defy you to find one news outlet that highlighted or analyzed what many consider the most dangerous part of her speech (until what you’re reading now, obviously). More on that shortly.

Prime Minister Ardern told the Assembly, “This week we launched an initiative alongside companies and nonprofits to help improve research and understanding of how a person’s online experiences are curated by automated processes.”

“This will also be important in understanding more about mis and disinformation online,” she explained. “A challenge that we must, as leaders, address.”

So, New Zealand’s national government and big companies, working together to “understand” “mis or disinformation.”

Sounds familiar.

Next Ardern said this problem of false informationor at least “false” information, according to the national government and big companiescannot be ignored.

She continued, “Sadly, I think it’s easy to dismiss this problem as one in the margins. I can certainly understand the desire to leave it to someone else. As leaders, we’re rightly concerned that the most light touch approaches to disinformation could be misinterpreted as being hostile to the values of free speech that we value so highly.”

Yeah, free speech is pretty important. We guard it jealously in the U.S.

The PM went on, “But while I cannot tell you today what the answer is to this challenge, I can say with complete certainty that we cannot ignore it. To do so poses an equal threat to the norms we all value.”

Valuable norms like… free speech, you mean?

She gave some examples of the supposed damage free speech might do.

“After all, how do you successfully end a war if people are led to believe the reason for its existence is not only legal but noble?” Ardern asked.

Excuse me? Having a difference of opinion on wars should be censored?

“How do you tackle climate change if people do not believe it exists?” she asked too.

Apparently, people can’t be allowed to have varied opinions on climate change or policies.

“How do you ensure the human rights of others are upheld, when they are subjected to hateful and dangerous rhetoric and ideology?” she pondered.

It’s actually simple: You protect the speech and prosecute any violence. 

This isn’t hard. Unless you think words are “violence,” which is absurd.

Ardern then described free expression and freely sharing news and ideas as “weapons.”

The PM said, “The weapons may be different but the goals of those who perpetuate them are often the same. To cause chaos and reduce the ability of others to defend themselves. To disband communities.” 

“To collapse the collective strength of countries who work together,” she added.

Does she mean her country of New Zealand where there is presumably a diversity of opinion OR her ‘country’ and others as defined by what the government and corporations presume to be right and true?

Then she sounded threatening.

“But we have an opportunity here to ensure that these particular weapons of war do not become an established part of warfare,” she said.

Oh yeah, how are you going to do that?

Unless I’m misunderstanding her, and I don’t think I am, again, for her warfare = free speech online.

“In these times, I am acutely aware of how easy it is to feel disheartened. We are facing many battles on many fronts,” she continued. 

“But there is cause for optimism,” she told government representatives from countries around the world. “Because for every new weapon we face, there is a new tool to overcome it. For every attempt to push the world into chaos, is a collective conviction to bring us back to order.”

“We have the means,” she insisted. “We just need the collective will.”

Independent journalist Glenn Greenwald quickly called this portion of her speech what it truly was: “the face of authoritarianism.”

Greenwald is correct that this is how tyranny comes—when elites are so convinced of their own righteousness that they should find “the collective will” to control the thoughts and ideas of others that don’t jibe with their worldview.

They convince themselves they are right. So why permit wrong? Why allow ‘wrong’ to exist when they “have the means” to stamp it out?

What PM Ardern said in this speech, and to the degree that this mindset is shared by powerful governments and corporations around the world, represents a terrible threat to liberal democracies everywhere.

The reason I mentioned that I could not find a single news outlet that covered or analyzed this disturbing part of Ardern’s speech is that so many journalists also consider themselves part of the elite.

I don’t know that they would disagree with Arden. So why write a story?

Traditionally, the press in democratic countries has championed free speech and news sharing.

That seems less the case today.


Unlike the United States where we have First Amendment protections, New Zealand has hate speech laws—that Jacinda Ardern has been eager to expand—similar to other countries.

But even in the U.S., elites have increasingly sought to tamp down on basic speech. Just a few months ago, roughly half the country was seemingly comfortable with the Biden administration establishing a federal agency to regulate speech. That’s a new development for the modern United States.

Was Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern’s authoritarian speech a warning? Or a prediction?

Like this article? Check out the latest BASEDPolitics podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or below:

YouTube player

Sign up for Our Email List

* indicates required
*By signing up for our email you consent to getting our emails directly in your inbox. These including our newsletter or other informational emails*

Our Latest Podcast

Related articles

Why it’s important that Matt Taibbi reported the Twitter Files

New Twitter owner Elon Musk has been teasing a...

Kanye West reminds us why edgelordism is a dead end

Kanye West is down with Hitler. Or so “Ye” said...

Is Apple working with China to suppress freedom protestors?

Apple CEO Tim Cook appeared on Capitol Hill this...

Kanye West is an anti-Semitic wokester

When Ye, the artist formerly known as Kanye West,...
Jack Hunter
Jack Hunterhttp://LibertyTree.com
Jack Hunter is a freelance writer, the co-author of Sen. Rand Paul’s 2011 book ‘The Tea Party Goes to Washington’ and the editor of the libertarian news site Liberty Tree, published by Sen. Paul’s campaign.

3 COMMENTS

  1. Not all “free speech” is free. Russia has weaponized this. Ignorance of Russia and fake news doesn’t make you right. We need to be careful of stepping on peoples freedoms, but freedoms do not equal free for alls.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here