Disturbing: UK arrests multiple protesters for speaking out against the monarchy

These stories should chill you to the bone if you care about free speech.

Defenders of the United Kingdom’s monarchy insist that it is ceremonial and does not, in practice, exert much political power. While that’s largely true, a good deal of governmental power is currently being exercised to shut down those who are criticizing the monarchy amid King Charles III’s succession.

As Newsweek reports, one man who yelled, “You’re a sick old man” at Prince Andrew during the queen’s funeral procession (referencing accusations regarding his connection to Jeffrey Epstein) was arrested and charged with “breach of the peace.”

A woman was reportedly arrested after displaying a “f*** imperialism, abolish monarchy” sign outside a cathedral where a ceremony for the king was taking place.

Another man was arrested but later “unarrested” after shouting, “Who elected him?” during a proclamation event.

“I don’t think I’ve ever seen anyone arrested on such threadbare grounds, let alone experienced it myself,” that man, Symon Hill, told the Guardian.

“I didn’t in any meaningful sense disrupt the ceremony,” he explained. “I just called out something that a few people near me would have heard, and then they carried on with the ceremony, and [the police] collared me. I find it really alarming that you can be arrested for expressing an opinion in public. I am feeling quite shaken.”

It doesn’t matter whether you love the monarchy or hate it; these stories should chill you to the bone if you care about free speech.

These British citizens simply spoke out in public against their government. They weren’t violent. They didn’t trespass. They didn’t call for violence. They simply communicated their disdain for the monarchy and levied public criticism against government officials.

If that can get you arrested, you’re not living in a free society. Period.

To be clear, I don’t necessarily condone heckling someone during a funeral procession. That’s in bad taste, in my opinion. But it’s still well within the confines of free speech.

Yes, these people are expressing minority viewpoints, as the monarchy remains overwhelmingly popular among the British people. Yet that’s exactly why their voices need to be heard. It’s never popular ideas that need protecting — it’s the dissenters. And, in many cases, they end up being on the right side of history, if their case is allowed to be heard in the public square.

Of course, none of these acts of censorship would hold up legally if the U.K. had free speech protections similar to our First Amendment. But it does not. And that’s the real takeaway for Americans witnessing this Orwellian saga.

Our friends in the U.K. are similar to us in culture, history, and countless other ways. Our people aren’t somehow different; we’re not immune to the same temptations toward censorship and suppression the British people have succumbed to. It’s our constitutional protections for free speech that keep us from heading down that path.

So, if we allow the First Amendment to be eroded here in the U.S., it won’t be long before we find ourselves facing the same kind of censorship we see happening right now across the pond.

This column originally appeared at the Washington Examiner.

Like this article? Check out the latest BASEDPolitics podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or below:

Sign up for Our Email List

* indicates required
*By signing up for our email you consent to getting our emails directly in your inbox. These including our newsletter or other informational emails*

Our Latest Podcast

Related articles

Geraldo Rivera embarrasses himself in Fox News gun-control debate (again)

Geraldo Rivera must have a humiliation kink. It’s hard...

Republicans introduce bill to audit THIS rogue government agency

Just a few years ago, many Americans likely had...

Signs indicate key Big Tech battle is heading to the Supreme Court

The US Supreme Court just asked the Solicitor General...

Antifa members are domestic terrorists. So are you, probably

Many antifa members are unquestionably terrorists. Six alleged members...
Brad Polumbo
Brad Polumbo
Brad Polumbo is a libertarian-conservative journalist and co-founder of Based Politics. His work has been cited by top lawmakers such as Senator Rand Paul, Senator Ted Cruz, Senator Pat Toomey, Congresswoman Nancy Mace, Congressman Thomas Massie, and former UN Ambassador Nikki Haley, as well as by prominent media personalities such as Jordan Peterson, Sean Hannity, Dave Rubin, Ben Shapiro, and Mark Levin. Brad has also testified before the US Senate, appeared on Fox News and Fox Business, and written for publications such as USA Today, National Review, Newsweek, and the Daily Beast. He hosts the Breaking Boundaries podcast and has a bachelor’s degree in economics from the University of Massachusetts Amherst.


  1. Nah, Brad. You are wrong. One thing to yell your political views at political events but not at a non political event. Same goes for a Church Service. Scream and holler you shit all day in the street. But come into a Church and pull that stunt and you deserve the beat down you should be getting.

  2. The risk to free speech is real, and must not be underestimated. However, it is not an absolute right, even here in America.
    Westboro Baptist proved that.

    One unwritten rule of our society is that we allow dignity to the bereaved…
    Our society is devolving in so many ways…let’s not allow funerals to be degraded as well.

    To be sure, none of these people should be charged…but if insistent on causing disruption, can be detained until the end of the ceremony. And no further…

  3. If you think this is bad, you may wish to consider the case of Graham Phillips, who is/was publicising “unauthorised” views from Donbass. He has been sanctioned under the same legislation used to seize the assets of Russian oligarchs, and his bank account(s) frozen.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here