Holy Cringe: No, Elizabeth Warren, Student Debt is Not a ‘Gender Justice’ Issue

The senator’s new rhetorical twist is an attempt to distract from the very legitimate arguments against 'canceling' student debt. 

Today’s a day that ends in y, so Elizabeth Warren is posting cringe again.

“Women owe over two-thirds of student debt,” the Massachusetts Democrat tweeted Thursday. “Canceling student debt would help give millions of women a fair shot at starting a business, saving for a home, and pursuing their dreams. Student debt is a gender justice issue. It’s time for [President Biden] to act.”

Suffice it to say that I find this attempt to put woke bubble wrap around a terrible policy proposal utterly unconvincing. 

It’s smart (if deeply disingenuous) rhetoric, though. After all, if “canceling” student debt becomes an issue of “gender justice,” then you can accuse anyone who disagrees with your plan to waste tax dollars of being sexist.

First, let’s clear the air. 

Women do hold more student debt than men. But that’s not because of sexism. It’s because more women now go to college than men! It only stands to reason, then, that they would hold more student debt. 

So, Warren’s attempt to make student debt a “gender justice” issue is patently absurd. She most likely knows, however, that the mainstream media and progressive Left will simply parrot this narrative, because questioning claims to victimhood is now beyond the pale among the woke elite.

The senator’s new rhetorical twist is also most likely an attempt to distract from the very legitimate arguments against “canceling” student debt. 

After all, student debt cancellation really means forcing all taxpayers—even the many who didn’t go to college—to eat the loss. The benefits flow almost exclusively to college graduates, but the tax burden is in part borne by the working class. 

So, student debt cancelation ironically isn’t “progressive” at all. It’s widely acknowledged as a “regressive” policy, which means it asks the poor and working class to pay more than their fair share. Indeed, a University of Chicago study found that the top 20% of income earners would see six times more benefit from canceling student debt than the bottom 20%. And recent analysis found that the ongoing “pause” in student loan payments mostly benefits doctors and lawyers

Not only that, but canceling student debt could actually lead to tuition prices increasing.

Why? Well, colleges and universities are only able to charge such obscenely high rates because the federal government subsidizes student loans.

“Canceling” student debt would further extend a blank taxpayer check to these schools—allowing them to continue offering degrees that are decreasing in value while also charging more for them. (They could never get away with all this in an actual competitive, free market). 

Ultimately, Senator Warren’s invocation of “gender justice” is a see-through attempt to cover up the fact that the policy she’s pushing for is an utterly unnecessary taxpayer bailout for affluent, Democratic-leaning voters. 

WATCH: 😳 1 Big Problem w/ Biden’s Crypto Executive Order (EXPOSED)

Sign up for Our Email List

* indicates required
*By signing up for our email you consent to getting our emails directly in your inbox. These including our newsletter or other informational emails*

Our Latest Podcast

Related articles

Brad Polumbo
Brad Polumbo
Brad Polumbo is a libertarian-conservative journalist and co-founder of Based Politics. His work has been cited by top lawmakers such as Senator Rand Paul, Senator Ted Cruz, Senator Pat Toomey, Congresswoman Nancy Mace, Congressman Thomas Massie, and former UN Ambassador Nikki Haley, as well as by prominent media personalities such as Jordan Peterson, Sean Hannity, Dave Rubin, Ben Shapiro, and Mark Levin. Brad has also testified before the US Senate, appeared on Fox News and Fox Business, and written for publications such as USA Today, National Review, Newsweek, and the Daily Beast. He hosts the Breaking Boundaries podcast and has a bachelor’s degree in economics from the University of Massachusetts Amherst.


  1. Good article. These type of statements that are blatantly misleading need to be called out and put in context when stated. I appreciate your willingness to do so. Friedman pointed out that it’s the poor paying for the upper-middle and upper classes education decades ago and it’s objective fact. Subsidizing higher education has led to a vicious cycle of incentivizing people to receive useless degrees while in their time receiving those useless degrees being filled with ideology that runs counter to the values of the west. Warren is calling for essentially subsidizing social activism.

    • This coming from the woman who claimed phony “minority” status to get a cushy faculty position in a “prestigious” institution where she raked in nearly a half million a year to teach one useless class. I assume that in order to provide “free” college education, compassionate, left leaning faculty members like her will forego their 6 figure paychecks, right?????? Yeah, sure they will.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here