The CDC Pushes More Propaganda on Cloth Masks

On Friday, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention used Twitter to once again push the narrative that masks, even cloth masks, protect people from COVID-19. There’s just one problem: the way they’re hawking this data is deeply misleading.

The CDC’s main claim, as shown in the above graphic, is that people who wore masks were much less likely to test positive for COVID-19. Even though everyone from former Biden advisors to CNN doctors has now acknowledged the uselessness of cloth masks, the CDC graphic still pushes the claim that cloth masks, too, can protect people. 

Set aside this study’s tiny sample size and likely biased, self-reported results. Many viewers may have missed the barely noticeable disclaimer at the bottom of the post that noted the findings for cloth masks were “not statistically significant.”

So… the CDC pushed out a post and graphic touting the supposed protection of cloth masks even though the findings are actually statistically insignificant. Yes, seriously. This is propaganda, not science. 

And it’s dangerous! At-risk people who see the CDC’s propaganda on cloth masks may mistakenly believe that cloth masks protect them. They could then go out in public without taking steps such as wearing N-95 masks, which actually have been proven to offer some degree of protection. 

Moreover, this latest dishonesty only worsens the CDC’s credibility crisis. 

It was viewed as highly credible before the pandemic. But now, nearly half of Americans do not trust what the CDC has to say about COVID. (Or much else!) And who can blame them?

This should prompt serious self-reflection at the CDC. But maybe the health agency simply considers this portion of the population “not statistically significant.”

Like this article? Check out the latest BASEDPolitics podcast on Apple PodcastsSpotify, or below:

Sign up for Our Email List

* indicates required
*By signing up for our email you consent to getting our emails directly in your inbox. These including our newsletter or other informational emails*

Our Latest Podcast

Related articles

Here’s Why Josh Hawley Owes Neil Gorsuch An Apology

In the last few weeks, the Supreme Court has...

Uvalde Police Harassing Hero Mom

Angeli Rose Gomez, the young mother who iconically rushed...
Jack Hunter
Jack Hunterhttp://LibertyTree.com
Jack Hunter is a freelance writer, the co-author of Sen. Rand Paul’s 2011 book ‘The Tea Party Goes to Washington’ and the editor of the libertarian news site Liberty Tree, published by Sen. Paul’s campaign.

2 COMMENTS

  1. There is a serious error of logic behind that graph.

    People who always wear a mask, and those who wear the best available mask, are also more likely to take other precautions such as avoiding crowded places. It is entirely possible that the differences in infection are the result, in whole or in part, to those precautions and the masks may have little or nothing to do with it.

    Studies that lack adequate controls are worse then useless.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here